Archive

Analyses

What the instrument outputs when pointed at a real process: model, measurement, finding, intervention, re-measurement — and the limits of the measurement.

ModeMeasuring
Records3 entries
TypeSample analyses

Every analysis published here is a sample analysis: processes and figures are constructed from typical mid-market structures, not collected at clients. It says so on each one. We show the method, not an invented track record.

Structure

How an analysis is built

Every analysis follows the same sequence. It is why there is a number at the end that can be challenged — and why the last section is never missing.

  1. 01

    Model

    The workflow is broken into steps: who does what, in which system, for how long. Handling times are given as a range from P10 to P90, never as a point value.

  2. 02

    Measurement

    The model is run tens of thousands of times. The spread yields lead time, throughput and utilisation per role — and the probability that a given step is the bottleneck.

  3. 03

    Finding

    One sentence, no jargon. Read only that sentence and you have the substance. Everything below it is evidence.

  4. 04

    Intervention

    Exactly what changes — one change, not a programme. Described so that someone could implement it on Monday.

  5. 05

    Re-measurement

    The same model with the change applied. Sometimes the saving turns out smaller than the effort; then that is what it says.

  6. 06

    Limits

    What the analysis does not show and where it can be wrong. Nothing is published without this section.

Why sample analyses

Flowrefy is young. A collection of real client figures would be quick to claim and just as quick to see through. Sample analyses are constructed, say so at every point, and still show in full what the instrument does. If you want to know what your own numbers would look like, model your own process — the software for it is out in the open.